Auguste Rodin 1840-1917
71 x 23.7 x 26 cm
Further images
Auguste Rodin’s Eve is among the most celebrated female figures of his career and one of his most psychologically compelling interpretations of the human body. Conceived in 1881 in connection with The Gates of Hell, the sculpture emerged during a period of extraordinary creative development for Rodin, shortly after he received the commission that would occupy him for much of the remainder of his life.
Rodin originally intended figures of Adam and Eve to flank The Gates of Hell, the monumental portal commissioned in 1880 for the proposed Museum of Decorative Arts in Paris. As the progenitors of humanity and the agents of the Fall, the two figures were conceived as a natural prelude to the tormented world represented beyond them. Yet rather than depicting Eve before the Fall, either in innocence or as a seductive temptress, Rodin chose the moment after she has eaten the fruit of the Tree of Knowledge. Newly conscious of her nakedness, Eve turns inward, lowering her head and drawing her arms across her body in an instinctive gesture of shame and self-protection.
Rodin began work on the life-size figure in 1881, but soon encountered an unexpected difficulty. Despite repeatedly altering the sculpture, he found himself unable to reconcile the changing contours of his model’s body. Only later did he discover that she was pregnant:
“Without knowing why, I saw my model changing. I modified my contours, naively following the successive transformations of ever-amplifying forms. One day, I learned she was pregnant; then I understood.”
Far from undermining the sculpture, the discovery transformed Rodin’s understanding of it. He later remarked to Henri-Charles Dujardin-Beaumetz that the model’s pregnancy had, quite unintentionally, “aided the character of the figure singularly.” Eve’s body thus acquired an additional symbolic resonance. She embodies not only shame and expulsion but also fertility and motherhood: the consequences of the Fall are already inscribed within her physical form.
As the pregnancy progressed, however, the model found it increasingly difficult to pose and eventually ceased coming to Rodin’s studio. The sculptor consequently abandoned the life-size Eve before bringing its surface to the degree of finish conventionally expected of Salon sculpture. When Rodin finally exhibited the large version in 1899, nearly two decades after its conception, the unfinished quality that had once prevented its presentation had become integral to the radical sculptural language for which he was celebrated.
Following the abandonment of the monumental figure, Rodin developed a smaller version of Eve. He produced variants with both round and square bases, the latter becoming the more widely disseminated form. The reduction also differs subtly from the life-size sculpture in the treatment of the hair, the positioning of the hands and feet, and the smoother articulation of the surface.
The extraordinary power of Eve lies in the relationship between the physical presence of the body and the psychological intensity of its pose. Her arms are drawn tightly across her chest, her head disappears towards their shadow, and her legs close protectively beneath her. The body appears simultaneously exposed and concealed. There is no theatrical display of grief; instead, emotion is communicated through the compression and withdrawal of the entire figure.
This quality particularly impressed Rainer Maria Rilke, who served for a period as Rodin’s secretary and became one of the most perceptive early writers on his sculpture. Rilke described Eve as appearing “enfolded in her arms,” her hands turned outwards as though attempting to push away both the external world and the transformations occurring within her own body. Elsewhere, he observed that the figure bends forward “as though listening over her own body in which a new future begins to stir.” His interpretation captures the remarkable ambiguity at the heart of the sculpture: Eve’s gesture communicates shame and apprehension, but also an awareness of the new life and future humanity contained within her.
Rodin’s conception was informed by his profound engagement with Renaissance sculpture and painting, strengthened by his journey to Italy in 1876. The influence of Michelangelo is particularly apparent in the compressed, protective attitude of Eve in the Sistine Chapel’s Fall and Expulsion from the Garden of Eden. Equally important was Masaccio’s Expulsion of Adam and Eve from Eden in the Brancacci Chapel, where bodily gesture becomes the principal vehicle for communicating psychological anguish. More broadly, the conception of The Gates of Hell itself inevitably invited comparison with Lorenzo Ghiberti’s celebrated bronze doors for the Baptistery of San Giovanni in Florence.
Yet Rodin transformed these historical precedents through an uncompromising observation of the living body. His Eve bears little relation to the slender, idealised female type prevalent in much nineteenth-century academic sculpture. Instead, her body possesses weight, muscularity and physical substance. Rodin did not suppress the individual characteristics of his model in pursuit of an abstract ideal of beauty; he used them to intensify the expressive meaning of the sculpture.
His description of the model reveals the qualities that initially attracted him to her: sun-darkened skin, quick and feline movements, muscular strength and a natural simplicity of bearing. These characteristics became fundamental to his conception of Eve. The sculpture's sensuality derives not from idealisation but from its sense of a living body — a body capable of movement, reproduction, vulnerability and strength.
In Eve, Rodin therefore brought together several of the concerns that would define his mature sculpture: his study of Renaissance art, his rejection of academic idealisation, his close observation of the model and his conviction that psychological experience could be expressed through the physical language of the body. Eve's bowed head and protective arms convey the consequences of the Fall without recourse to elaborate narrative. Her entire body becomes the expression.
The present Alexis Rudier bronze preserves this remarkable combination of sensuality and introspection in concentrated form. Reduced in scale yet retaining the physical authority of Rodin’s original conception, Eve embodies the sculptor’s ability to transform a familiar biblical subject into something profoundly human: a figure poised between shame and self-awareness, vulnerability and strength, whose inward gesture gives monumental form to an intensely private experience.
Provenance
Rodin Museum, Paris.Private collection USA, acquired from the above, July 1951.
Private collection.
Literature
Albert E. Elsen, Rodin's Art, New York, 2003, pp.187-191.
Albert E. Elsen, The Gates of Hell by Auguste Rodin, Stanford, 1985, pp. 74 -78, no. 64 (illustrations of another cast).
Ambrosini Lynne, Michelle Facos. Rodin: The Cantor Gift to The Brooklyn Museum, New York, 1987, p. 151 (illustrations of another cast).
Antoinette Le Normand-Romain, The Bronzes of Rodin, Catalogue of the Works in the Rodin Museum, Vol. I, Paris, 2007, pp. 338, 340-341, 345 & 348 (illustration of another cast).
Georges Grappe, Catalogue of the Rodin Museum, Paris, 1929, p. 41, no. 55 (illustration of the marble version).
H. Dujardin-Beaumetz, Conversations with Rodin, Paris, 1913.
Ionel Jianou & Cécile Goldscheider, Rodin, Paris, 1967, pl.17 (illustration of the plaster).
John L. Tancock, The Sculpture of Auguste Rodin, Philadelphia, 1976, p. 154, no. 8-5. (illustration of another cast).
Judith Cladel, Auguste Rodin, His glorious life, his unknown life, Paris, 1936.
Rainer M. Rilke, Auguste Rodin, Los Angeles, 2018, pp. 43-44 (illustration of another cast).
Rainer M. Rilke, ‘Rodin’ in Issue 45 of Studies in French Literature, New York, 1946, p. 22.
Raphäel Masson & Véronique Mattiusi, Rodin, Paris, 2004, p. 39 (illustration of another cast).
